Reply To: tZHEUYsvSkaPsGsMEIzqmKKUOcmSdtu3 oipE5L6W

[Zemninema]

More specifically, the complaint alleges that Solvay was not likely to prevail in the patent litigation because Watson and Par Paddock developed persuasive arguments and amassed substantial evidence that their generic products did not infringe the 894 patent and that the patent was invalid and or unenforceable emphasis added propecia for hair loss